In today’s policy landscape, urgency is often framed as leadership.
We see this in the rapid rollout of large-scale programs such as Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) and the Koperasi Merah Putih initiative. Both are ambitious, highly visible, and politically compelling. They promise impact at scale—improving nutrition, strengthening the people’s economy, and delivering tangible results quickly.
But policy is not only about signalling. It is about solving.
The challenge is when the political economy of policymaking places greater weight on speed, visibility, and symbolic delivery than on policy readiness. Programs are announced and scaled before critical design questions are fully resolved:
Is the targeting mechanism precise and adaptive?
Are supply chains and last-mile delivery systems ready to operate at scale?
Do local institutions have the capacity to implement and monitor effectively?
Has there been a rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis relative to alternative interventions?
In the case of MBG, the ambition to address child nutrition is undeniably important. Yet delivering meals at a national scale requires more than budget allocation—it demands robust logistics, quality control, coordination across ministries and local governments, and safeguards against leakage. Without these, the risk is not just inefficiency, but also uneven outcomes across regions.
Similarly, the Koperasi Merah Putih agenda speaks to a long-standing aspiration: strengthening cooperative-based economic institutions. But history has shown that cooperative success depends less on scale and more on governance quality, member participation, and economic viability. Scaling cooperatives rapidly, without addressing these structural constraints, risks reproducing form without function.
This is where implementation diagnostics matter.
Too often, these programs follow a familiar trajectory: rapid launch, large fiscal commitment, and accelerated expansion—followed by coordination challenges, institutional bottlenecks, and adjustments made after the fact. By then, significant resources have already been committed.
This is not an argument against ambition. Indonesia needs bold policies.
But ambition without evidence-based design, ex-ante evaluation, and iterative learning risks becoming costly. Public policy should not operate as real-time experimentation at full scale—especially when it involves substantial public funds and affects millions of lives.
Good policy requires discipline.
Discipline to pause before scaling.
Discipline to test before expanding.
Discipline to listen before deciding.
Because in the end, governance is judged not by how quickly policies are launched, but by how well they work.
Taking time to think is not a delay.
It is a responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment